Corporate governance compliance India

Corporate governance is the set of processes,Whistle blowing policy be made compulsory to all
customs, policies, laws, and institutions affecting thecompanies
way a corporation is directed, administered orThe principled conduct of multinational corporations is
controlled. Corporate governance also includes theabsolutely essential in planting the seeds of stability and
relationships among the many stakeholders involvedprosperity for all. Multinational corporations account for
and the goals for which the corporation is governed.one-third of the world's Gross Domestic Product, and
The principal stakeholders are the shareholders,two-thirds of world trade. Multinationals can be a
management, and the board of directors. Otherpowerful influence for good - especially in countries
stakeholders include employees, customers, creditors,whose governments lack a strong tradition of
suppliers, regulators, and the community at large.democracy and the rule of law. Therefore, it is no
Corporate governance has emerged as an importantlonger sufficient for multinational corporations to do
both in India and globally. Expectations of stakeholdersmerely what is legal. In every instance, multinational
are extremely high and the scrutiny by regulators andcorporations must do what is right - through their
investors incredibly stringent. As a consequence, Indianconduct, not just their words.
companies are proactively implementing measures forIn a speech titled "Globalization's Next Frontier:
the same. Going forward, one of the most importantPrincipled Codes of Conduct that Bolster the Rule of
challenges for Board members is to build a foundationLaw," Parrett told global ethics and business leaders,
of trust with management, the investment community,and representatives from non-governmental
regulatory agencies and the public. The stakes are highorganizations (NGOs) and academic institutions that
and the margin for error is low and while newglobalization and world security itself could be
standards are emerging, one thing remains clear: thejeopardized unless multinational corporations develop
responsibility to adopt sound governance practices hasethical conduct that adheres to values and principles
been placed squarely on corporate Directors andrather than just written law.
officers.Law makers in India, feel the need to ascertain the
My favorite is one from the Harvard Business School.merits of encouraging a principle-based approach (like
It found that "ethics-based" companies increased theirin the case of the combined code in the UK) to
net income 756 percent - versus just 1 percent forcompliance - where the nature, size and complexities
companies who put profit first. My message today isof a business govern compliance and disclosures -
that principled economic behavior is a long-terminstead of a standard rules based approach for
investment in the security of nations. The world cannotuniversal compliance (like in the US). Companies in India
afford economic misconduct. Now multinationalmust have the flexibility to ascertain those aspects
corporations everywhere to lead the world towhich are practical to comply with and others where
globalization's next frontier - through principled codes ofthey can provide suitable and logical explanations for
conduct that bolster the rule of law. Not just the letternon compliance. This will enable them demonstrate
of the law - not just minimum compliance with sometheir true intend to comply, where practical, and make
baseline code. But, instead, something that will reallyto transparent disclosures in other cases.
make a difference! Principled codes of conduct thatIn India, guidelines for corporate governance are
answer first to the moral underpinnings that support allprovided in clause 49 of the listing agreement and also
law. Principled codes of conduct that set objective,in various sections of the Companies Act. Industry
quantifiable standards. Principled codes of conduct thatexperts hold view that once appointed, the
use independent monitoring - and require transparentperformance and contributions of these directors
communication with the public.should be monitored and evaluated objectively with
Indispensable Principles of Corporate Governance:peer reviews serving as a means of such evaluations.
• Discipline in operationsA stronger corporate governance framework is
• Transparency in dealings and disclosuresneeded to prevent Satyam-like financial frauds. There
• Accountability to shareholdersis a need to strengthen regulators and company laws
• Responsibility of company's actionto improve corporate governance, by the corporate
• Social Responsibilityministry. A new Companies Bill, which is pending in
• Improving group dynamics and harnessingParliament, would make regulation more stringent for
individual talentsauditors. The new bill seeks to revamp archaic laws to
• Enhancing early-warning mechanisms for criticalhelp India's growing corporate sector adopt
risksinternational best practice, and make boards and senior
• Mitigating exposure to liabilitymanagement of companies more accountable.
• Building credibility and trust with stakeholdersWhat is to be kept in mind is that in India adequate
• Embedding sustainability as a corporate valuesafeguards are provided for in the form of various
What is the Satyam fiasco all about?laws but the penalty stipulated for is comparatively
For me, Satyam's case is a typical example of fraudmeagre and thus the wrong doers have no fear of
that are extremely difficult to detect and prevent. Thepunishment. Only if the punishments to be imposed are
chairman of Satyam diligently hatched a plan tomade stringent and it acts as a deterrent can it be
defraud its stakeholders and to gain advantage toexpected that such frauds can be controlled in future.
itself.More so, there is no expertise of the implementing
There is a sufficient law to deal with this kind ofauthorities for detecting and curing the Economic
economic offences and corporate governance. In aOffences. There is a need to make a separate body
global environment, principles are important becauseto look into the affairs and implement the laws and
rules cannot cover all situations, however there areother provisions to curtail such offences. There is also
following observations that encourages the nona lack of political will power to curb such offences, the
compliance in India:politicians take a lenient view and leave the
Non compliance is never taken seriously by theinvestigation and other vital steps into the hands of CBI
companies as there is minimum penalty for nonwhich is not a body made to specifically deal with such
compliance.white collar crimes. Unless there reason enough for the
Minimum penalty of few hundreds rupeesmiscreants to be scared of penal provisions that send
Most of the offences for non compliance can bea shiver down their spine. Such offences will continue
compounded by paying the fine.to happen and we will keep thinking of devising ways
The government department do have the appropriateto tackle with them.
expertise or manpower to detect the non complianceArbitrator is a technically name of a person selected
The prosecution agency also do not have the expertwith reference to an established system for friendly
who specialise in this kind of expertise, hence the mostdetermination of controversy which, though not judicial,
of the offender can not be prosecuted.yet is regulated by law; so that the powers and duties
Lack of political willof the arbitrator, when once he is chosen, are
Typical Indian attitude that is "chalta hai"prescribed by law, and his doings may be judicially
Suggestions:revised if he has exceeded his authority. Thus, the
Strong punishment i.e. life term for offendersarbitrator is a private, disinterested person, chosen by
There should be specialised investigating agency andthe parties to a disputed question, for the purpose of
that should be allowed to hire the best professionals.hearing their contentions, and giving judgment between
More power to independent directors and they shouldthem, to whose decision, called "award", the litigants
be allowed to engage the professional to explain thesubmit themselves either voluntary, or, in some cases,
company's record/ accounts.compulsorily, by order of court.
Effective & ongoing training to all the employees