Internationalisation of the Indian Legal Services Market

Introduction:given the vast pool of legal professionals in India. It can
Indian market is growing and many multi nationalvery well be said that the Bar Association of India is
companies have opened up offices in India in thefully cognizant of the un-savoury legal practices and
recent past. Nearly half of the fortune five hundredwill be able to regulate against them. Overall, the Indian
companies in India have either opened their offices orcitizens and the clients will benefit from the entry of
their call centres. Indian companies are taking overforeign law firms as they will be facilitated by a wider
companies abroad. With estimates of annual growtharray of expertise from the industry. They should also
ranging between 7 and 9 per cent, India’s economybe allowed so that they bring with them a fresh brand
is one of the fastest-growing in the world.of professionalism, competence and expertise that the
Even more importantly, the type of economic activitylegal profession here has failed to develop on their
that Foreign Law Firms are likely to profit from- suchown.
as large cross border deals- is growing even faster. AThe clients of foreign firms, mainly multinationals, would
greater number of foreign clients are now involved inoffer considerably higher pay package than those
Indian transactions, too, which is why these firms wantoffered in India and the opening up of legal services
to establish a stronghold in India, to better serve theirwould bring in foreign investment with them which in
clients.turn would be helpful and supportive in the overall
The Indian Bar Council has imposed restrictions on thegrowth of the economy. More to the point is that the
activities of foreign law firms in recent years that haveforeign law firms will be ready to lend a hand in the
sharply curtailed participation of foreign law firms in thecreation of jobs in the legal market.
Indian legal services market. 
India requires that anyone wishing to practice law mustIt will allow firms to outsource price-pressured
enroll as a member of the Bar Council and if thatcommoditized and mid-level services to their own
person happens to be a foreign national then he mustoffices in India, rather than referring the work to other
belong to a country that allows Indian nationalslocal firms, so keeping a tighter grip on quality and client
reciprocal rights to practice in their country. Foreignservice and improving communication and collaboration
Direct Investment is not permitted in this sector, andefficiencies. Apart from foreign law firms’ familiarity
international law firms are also not authorized to openwith global operations of foreign owned businesses,
offices in India. Foreign services providers may bethey also provide higher comfort to the headquarter
engaged as employees or consultants in local lawstaff of foreign businesses and permit flexibility in
firms, but they cannot sign legal documents, representaccess to a variety of legal service providers.
clients, or be appointed as partners. 
In 1994, two New York-based and one London-basedForeign law firms have tie-ups and associate offices in
law firm had sought permission from the ReserveIndia with whom they continue to work. So, even if
Bank of India (RBI) to begin liaison office activities inthey have not set up offices in India, they have liaison
India to advise and assist non-Indian clients inoffices or India departments that effectively do the
connection with their activities in India and outside India.work. If we allow them more transparency and open
The three law firms, White & Case (New York),up the avenues for their full fledged offices it will not
Chadbourne & Parke (New York) and Ashurst Morrisonly help remove the ambiguity but will provide a
Crisp (United Kingdom) were granted permission underubiquitous disposition and will moreover concretise the
the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) to startprevailing concept. 
liaison activities. However, in 1995, Lawyers’ 
Collective, a public interest trust set up by lawyers toAlthough the initiation of the foreign firms would come
provide legal aid, moved Bombay High Courtas a rude and uncouth shock to the most of the
challenging the right of foreign law firms to “practicelawyers who consider the profession as their birth right
law” in India. The High Court had held that thebut would be accommodating in curbing the personal
practices engaged by these firms amounted tofiefdoms in the field which is created by some of the
“practicing the law” and hence were not to befamily run partnership firms working on feudalistic lines,
permitted. The Foreign Law Firms had challenged thisbereft of professionalism and vision.
judgment to the Supreme Court, which remanded theA significant number of Indian law graduates are being
case back to the High Court to hear and decide.recruited or are poached, either as associates or as
Today there are about 38 ‘magic circle’ firmstrainees, by the leading law firms outside. For the last
with their liaison offices or referral relationships withfew years, the leading law schools have attracted the
their Indian counterparts, while others strike up informalattention of foreign law firms in their campus
associations.recruitment programmes. So the moral of the story is
 clearly written on the wall that if we do not allow the
Regulations:foreign firms to cross the threshold they will take
For the purpose of regulating the legal service and theaway the brightest of our law graduates nurture them
practising of lawyers in the courts the Indian legislatureand make us the victims of brain drain. This would
has enacted the Advocates Act which has provisionsmake the legal field tantamount the engineering
for the supervision of the legal arena.colleges where in the talent is poached by foreign
Sec. 24 of the Advocates Act requires that onlycompanie
natural persons who are citizens of India can beThe reasons why the Indian legal market should not be
enrolled as Advocates. This section also provides thatunwrapped to the world are:
apart from other provisions contained in the Act, aThe opening of the Indian legal market is not only
national of any other country may be admitted as anprejudicial to the interests of the Indian legal profession,
advocate on a State roll, if citizens of India, dulybut liberalisation also has important implications for the
qualified, are permitted to practice law in that othernation. The legal profession is instrumental to the
country.administration of justice. To permit foreign lawyers to
Sec. 33 of Advocates Act: Advocates alone entitledencroach on this extremely important aspect of a
to practice: Except as otherwise provided in this Actdemocracy could be contrary to public interest. A
or in any other law for the time being in force, nosymbiotic system of co-existence that has succeeded
person shall, on or after the appointed day, be entitledin meeting every need of a client has always been in
to practice in any court or before any authority orplace. This system has worked well for decades and
person unless he is enrolled as an advocate under thisthere is no reason why it will not work in the future.
Act.The effect of the expansion of the market will be a
Sec. 47 of the Advocates Act subjects of any foreignshift by Indian corporate clients to foreign law firms
country, which discriminates against the citizen of Indiawho offer services on a scale that Indian law firms
in the matter of legal practice, shall not be entitled tocannot presently match. Those Indian law firms that
practice in India. It also empowers the Bar Council ofprovide services in commercial law can expect to find
India to lay down conditions subject to which foreignthemselves under severe competition, and perhaps
subjects may be recognized for being enrolled as aneven forced out of business. The fear then is that
advocate.foreign law firms will end up eliminating their Indian
Rule 2 of Chapter III under Sec.49 (1) (ah) of thecompetitors and will create a situation similar to that
Advocates Act reads as: An Advocate shall not enterwhich exists in the field of accounting.
into a partnership or any other arrangement for sharingThere is a stark difference between the nature of the
remuneration with any person or legal Practitioner wholegal tradition in India and those of the foreign firms,
is not an Advocate.which are representative of a legal culture of
Even if a foreigner is allowed certificate of practiceambulance chasers. Globalization and liberalization of
law in India, he has to secure permission from RBI if hethe legal field is resisted on the ground that in India
desires to acquire foreign exchange and remit therendering legal advice is a service to society and
same outside India under Sec. 29 and Sec. 30 of thehence there exists restrictions on soliciting and advising.
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. Although theThe Indian Law Firms argue that they are not
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act has been repealedprepared for the onslaught in the form of competition
we have similar provisions in the Foreign Exchangefrom global firms and the proposal to open up the legal
Management Act, 1999 which is the successor of theservice sector is premature as Indian law firms are at
previous Act.a nascent stage of development. Some firms also
Sec.11 of the Companies Act provides that aclaim that allowing corporatisation will destroy the
partnership or any other form of association with morevalues of the local industry, turning lawyers into
than 20 partners if not registered as a company, shallmercenaries.
be an unlawful assembly. Thus Indian law firms cannotThere is no comparison between the legal sector and
have more than 20 partners.other sectors. No country has thrown open the sector
Apart from all these barriers the legal fraternity in Indiaovernight. Japan took 20 years. Korea has been
is neither too interested in allowing their foreigndeliberating for more than 10 years. And Japan, Korea
counterparts to rub shoulders with them and is quiteand China had other reasons for liberalisation -
adamant and opinionated on the opposition of thelanguage barriers, cultural differences and inherent
globalization of the six hundred crore large legalinadequacies. US also has the most rigid rules on
service industry.foreign firms. India, on the other hand, is quite
All these enactments, legislations and hostility make theself-sufficient. So, India should not be in such a tearing
legal services field a difficult sphere to tread on andhurry to open up the market and rather give it a
also make the option virtually impregnable and highlyprudent thought.
unattractive for the foreign entities to set foot in the 
Indian legal scenario.Conclusion:
Change is in the air:It is a quest of balance of advantage. It is a common
But the winds of change have started blowing andphenomenon in India that prior to liberalization of any
that too in the right direction. The Indian government issector, there is been widespread opposition for
planning to liberalize its stand on the opening of theexample the Insurance sector. The reason for this
legal market and is keen on deciding to make it a levelappear to be that corporate law remains more or less
playing field. There has been a change in thehomogenous across borders. The fact remains that
government’s policy and course of action. TheIndia is in the process of globalizing its economy. In the
government is in favour of allowing foreign law firmsprocess, the legal market opening up to competition
and lawyers to open up offices in the country, althoughfrom the international legal market is rather inevitable.
it has evoked mixed reactions amongst the legalInstead of deliberating about the advantages and
fraternity. In terms of professional demand, there is adisadvantages of the legal markets being opened up
shortage of legal experts to the tune of 22%,to foreign firms, it is perhaps more sensible to accept
according to a FICCI report.  The Government hasthat the entry of foreign firms in India is only a matter
shown interest in making Limited Liability Partnershipsof time. This should be seen as an opportunity: for the
(LLPs) a reality in India and has taken efforts to havelaw firms, of competition, and for the graduates, as a
an enactment in place to govern it. This would enablewider range of employment options.
foreign law firms (as well as accounting firms) to haveAdvocating protectionism is taking a parochial and
tie-ups and associate offices in India and can comemyopic view. Parochial, because liberalization will only
into operation in this manner. The Bar Council is alsoshut-shop for uncompetitive entities, which are a
looking into the requests for relaxing the constraints onburden on the economy. Myopic because the long
advertising the legal profession.term benefits should be the driving consideration for
India being a signatory to the General Agreement onpolicy makers. Liberalization of services involves fairly
Trade in Services (GATS), which is an organ of thepainful short-term adjustment costs, which requires
World Trade Organization (WTO) and whosethat the institutional and regulatory environment be
objective is to facilitate free flow of services acrossstrengthened before hand. Once these are put in place
the world, is under an obligation to open up the servicethe Indian economy can take the advantage of entire
sector to Member Nations and the legal profession isAsian market both drawing inwards and supplying
also taken to be one of the services which is includedoutwards the services of legal professionals. If India
in GATS.held back, it risked "missing the boat" on a change that
 would give it access to needed legal expertise and
"Services" would include any service in any sectorincrease the opportunities for local lawyers to do
except services supplied in the exercise ofinternational work.
governmental authorities as defined in GATS. "AThe matter regarding entry of foreign firms and
service supplied in the exercise of governmentallawyers into India requires in-depth deliberations and
authorities" is also defined to mean any service that isshould be carefully considered in consultation with the
supplied neither on a commercial basis nor inBar Council of India(BCI), All India Bar
competition with one or more service suppliers. SinceAssociation(AIBA), Supreme Court Bar
India is a responsible prominent and founder memberAssociation(SCBA), Bar Association of India(BAI),
country of the multilateral trading system, it mustSociety of Indian Law Firms(SILF) and other bodies of
endeavour to abide by its commitment to the WTO.the legal profession before a final decision is taken. In
 the light of the above discussion the following
With all these tribulations and the development ofrecommendations will be of great importance and will
favourable environment, the advent of foreign lawhelp the industry to take it further.
firms seems to be not quite far away. But before·         The law ministry, the Attorney
allowing the foreign law firms to operate on the IndianGeneral's office, the BCI and some leading Indian law
soil, there are a few grounds works which should befirms and lawyers ought to form a committee and set
done in order to make it a smooth process for bothup the rules for foreign lawyers practicing in India.
the parties.·         The guidelines for advertising in law
 directories, maintaining websites, publishing of firms
Some restrictions should be provided for the incomingbrochure, etc, ought to be streamlined.
firms which off course have to be reasonable enough·         The law prescribing a limit of 20
to give them a fair chance in the light of “equality ofpartners should be reviewed and the concept of
opportunity”. Adequate safeguards andlimited liability partnership adopted.
qualifications should be provided for besides reciprocity.·         Professional negligence insurance
Before the opening up of the legal profession, there isshould be made compulsory for all lawyers.
need to introduce advance-level legal courses in theReference and bibliography:
country. We have enough talent and endeavour to1.       Should foreign law firms get entry into
beat anyone in the world. As long as the basicIndia? By Dhananjay
principles set out by International Bar Association, that  
is, fairness, uniform and non-discriminatory treatment, (
clarity and transparency, professional responsibility,2.       Law firms given hope of India
reality and flexibility are met, the entry of the Foreignbreakthrough Michael. by Peel and Joe Leahy. (
Law Firms should not pose any problems.3.       Should foreign law firms be allowed into
 India? By Cyril
Anything that improves competition would be a       
welcome development. But there is going to be a long           (
cause and effect list because of the entry of the4.       Foreign Law firms in India: Legally, the
foreign law firms. Sooner or later the trend ofworld may not be flat by fiorz Ali k (
liberalization is going to takeover the restrictive mode1. Opposition to foreign law firms' entry by Legal
of the Indian market. A close analysis of the changingCorrespondent The Hindu. (
scenario with respect to the entry of foreign law firms2. "Entry of foreign law firms will cause havoc" by
has to be done in order to arrive at the outcome as toLegal Correspondent, The Hindu. (
what can be the benefits and how are we going to be3. The Advocates Act,1961 (Act no. 25 of 1961)
affected by the homing prospect.4. Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (Act 46 of
 1973)
 5. The Foreign Exchange Maintenance Act, 1999 (Act
 no 42 of 1999)
 6. The Companies Act, 1956 (Act no. 1 of 1956)
The arguments in the favour of making the legal7. You just cannot stop the entry of law firms by
services market transparent and open are:Partner, Fox Mandal Little. (
 8. FICCI Arbitration and Conciliation tribunal (FACT).
The first and foremost to be affected would be the       
Indian law firms and lawyers. The immediate impact on          (
Indian law firms would be of hugely increasing9. Openness is key to the future by David Lewis. (
competition for work from foreign law firms. From the10.  Law Commission of India ,184th Report  on The
lawyer’s point of view, working with internationalLegal Education & Professional Training and Proposals
law firms and opening up of this sector in India wouldfor Amendments to the Advocates Act, 1961 and the
throw open a gamut of opportunities for aspiringUniversity Grants Commission Act, 1956
lawyers to learn, develop and further their careers.11. Foreign law firms are already present in our country
Any resistance is due to a rash assumption about theby Asha Nayar Basu
threat of competition. Moreover, allowing foreign12. UK's Indian lawyers want two-way street by
private law firms in India will certainly help the lawyersSudeshna Sen, (
get better job opportunities and break the monopoly of13.  India’s legal market on the cusp of inevitable
a handful private law firms working in India.    change By Reena SenGupta (
 14. Indian Court Ponders Opening Legal Market to
Indian citizens would also be affected as the entry ofForeign Firms by Richard Lloyd (
foreign law firms is expected to increase the15. INDIA (
professionalism and quality of conduct in the legal16. Bar Council of India resolution opposes entry of
profession. As legal standards improve, the cost offoreign firms by Malathi Nayak (
legal services may go up but cannot go up significantly17. Lowering the bar, a report by Ben Frumin.