Product Patent Regime in India

The major concern that the social and economic costs• Exceptions from patentability; and
of introducing pharmaceutical patents are likely to• Limits on data protection
outweigh the benefits in the case of most developingIndia as a member of WTO, tried to make its patent
countries suggests a cautious approach to intellectuallegislation TRIPS compliant by bringing into force the
property protection in the area of pharmaceuticals. OnPatents (Amendment) Act 2005 w.e.f. 1st January,
the other side, there is also evidence that the patent2005 which provided for product patents - a long
system has a detrimental impact on pharmaceuticaldebated issue globally and nationally.
prices, particularly if the product itself is protectable.Making the patent legislation in compliance with the
The WTO's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects ofTRIPS would put India in the row of nations having
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) introducedstrong patent legislation. Salient features of the Patents
intellectual property rules into the multilateral trading(Amendment) Act 2005 related to product patents:a)
system for the first time. The World TradeExtension of product patent protection to products in
Organization (WTO) is the only most powerfulsectors of drugs, foods and chemical.b) Term for
legislative and judicial body which makes an economicprotection of product patent shall be for 20 years.c)
relationship between trade and nations with its "freeIntroduction of a provision for enabling grant of
trade" agenda.compulsory license for export of medicines to
The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects ofcountries which have insufficient or no manufacturing
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is a treatycapacity; provided such importing country has either
administered by the World Trade Organization (WTO)granted a compulsory license for import or by
which sets down minimum standards for forms ofnotification or otherwise allowed importation of the
intellectual property (IP) regulation that was negotiatedpatented pharmaceutical products from India (in
at the end of the Uruguay Round of the Generalaccordance with the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) treaty inPublic Health)d) A new provision has been introduced
1994. The new WTO regime effectively outlawed thethat provides that the mere discovery of a new form
generic production of new medicinesof a known substance which does not result in the
It was made mandatory by the WTO for itsenhancement of the known efficacy of that
developing nations to fully abide by their IP laws andsubstance or the mere discovery of any new
enforcement practices with the agreement on TRIPSproperty or new use for a known substance or of the
by no later than 1st January 2005. It lays downmere use of a known process, machine or apparatus
minimum standards for protection and enforcement ofunless such known process results in a new product
intellectual property rights in member countries whichor employs at least one new reactant, shall not be
are required to promote effective and adequatepatentable.
protection of intellectual property rights with a view toThese amendments have been made with the
reducing distortions and impediments to internationalintention to make India drug and pharma industries
trade. For the least-developed countries (LDCs) thecompetitive at par with multinational companies. The
transition period will remain in force for pharmaceuticalgeneric drugs would have a limitation and the MNCs
patents and data protection at least until 2016 underwould enjoy monopolistic rights, however there is a
Article 66.1 of TRIPS under paragraph 7 of the Dohasilver lining in this concept that it would attract contract
Declaration.R&D and therefore MNCs would prefer to open
Further, Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreementtheir R&D centers in India.
harmonizes the subject matter of patent in a broadThe major concern arising out of these amendments
manner which clearly states that the patents shall beis increased prices of drugs thus creating problems for
available for any inventions, whether products orthe poor. Resolving such a problem would not be easy
processes, in all fields of technology, provided that theybut other regulatory mechanisms could be put in place
are new, involve an inventive step and are capable ofto control the drug prices. Indian government can make
industrial application and patent rights enjoyable withoutuse of price controls, its bargaining power as a large
discrimination as to the place of invention, the field ofpurchaser, and compulsory licenses in the meantime to
technology and whether products are imported orensure that the process does not proceed more
locally produced.quickly than is desirable.
Under article 28 (1) (a) of TRIPS, there are exclusiveIndian pharmaceutical firms may also suffer with the
rights for product patents to prevent third parties notlack of Indian jobs. This fear is by no means
having the owner's consent from the acts of: making,far-fetched, but there are lots of reasons to have a
using, offering for sale, selling, or importing for thesefaith that Indian industry would be able to compete with
purposes that product.global players. Such as an educated, well-trained
Overall, the TRIPS Agreement will have a substantialscientific workforce that is a backbone of current
impact on intellectual property regimes in developingsuccessful Indian Pharmaceutical industry. Moreover,
countries. Although, under the TRIPS Agreementby passing such reforms that would encourage the
member countries are bound to provide suchdevelopment of venture capital, India's government can
protection, yet certain compensatory measures andmake certain that funding will be available for the
schemes are taken in the hands to avoid the negativecountry's nascent biotechnology industry, an industry
impact of monopolization of product patents especiallythat holds the promise of making significant
in health and pharmaceutical sectors. Such measurescontributions to India's economic growth and public
as per the TRIPS are as follows:health needs.
• Transition periodsTaking into account social benefits only is
• Compulsory Licensingcompromising with economic stand. For making the
• Public, non-commercial use of patentsnation strong, the approach should be for
• Parallel importssocio-economic development.
• Exceptions to patent rights