Startup Law 101 Series - Ten Essential Legal Tips For Startups at Formation

Here are ten essential legal tips for startup founders.windfall equity grant. There are special exceptions, but
1. Set up your legal structure early and use cheapthe rule for most founders should be to grant them
stock to avoid tax problems.restricted stock, i.e., stock that can be repurchased by
No small venture wants to invest too heavily in legalthe company at cost in the event the founder leaves
infrastructure at an early stage. If you are a solothe company. Restricted stock lies at the heart of the
founder working out of the garage, save your dollarsconcept of sweat equity for founders. Use it to make
and focus on development.sure founders earn their keep.
If you are a team of founders, though, setting up a5. Make timely 83(b) elections.
legal structure early is important.When restricted stock grants are made, they should
First, if members of your team are developing IP, thealmost always be accompanied by 83(b) elections to
lack of a structure means that every participant willprevent potentially horrific tax problems from arising
have individual rights to the IP he develops. A keydownstream for the founders. This special tax election
founder can guard against this by getting everyone toapplies to cases where stock is owned but can be
sign "work-for-hire" agreements assigning such rightsforfeited. It must be made within 30 days of the date
to that founder, who in turn will assign them over to theof grant, signed by the stock recipient and spouse, and
corporation once formed. How many founding teamsfiled with the recipient's tax return for that year.
do this. Almost none. Get the entity in place to capture6. Get technology assignments from everyone who
the IP for the company as it is being developed.helped develop IP.
Second, how do you get a founding team togetherWhen the startup is formed, stock grants should not
without a structure? You can, of course, but it isbe made just for cash contributions from founders but
awkward and you wind up with having to makealso for technology assignments, as applicable to any
promises that must be taken on faith about what willfounder who worked on IP-related matters prior to
or will not be given to members of the team. On theformation. Don't leave these hangning loose or allow
flip side, many a startup has been sued by a founderstock to be issued to founders without capturing all IP
who claimed that he was promised much more thanrights for the company.
was granted to him when the company was finallyFounders sometimes think they can keep IP in their
formed. As a team, don't set yourselves up for thisown hands and license it to the startup. This does not
kind of lawsuit. Set the structure early and get things inwork. At least the company will not normally be
writing.fundable in such cases. Exceptions to this are rare.
If you wait too long to set your structure up, you runThe IP roundup should include not only founders but all
into tax traps. Founders normally work for sweatconsultants who worked on IP-related matters prior to
equity and sweat equity is a taxable commodity. If youcompany formation. Modern startups will sometimes
wait until your first funding event before setting up theuse development companies in places like India to help
structure, you give the IRS a measure by which to putspeed product development prior to company
a comparatively large number on the value of yourformation. If such companies were paid for this work,
sweat equity and you subject the founders toand if they did it under work-for-hire contracts, then
needless tax risks. Avoid this by setting up early andwhoever had the contract with them can assign to the
using cheap stock to position things for the foundingstartup the rights already captured under the
team.work-for-hire contracts. If no work-for-hire
Finally, get a competent startup business lawyer toarrangements were in place, a stock, stock option, or
help with or at least review your proposed setup. Dowarrant grant should be made, or other legal
this early on to help flush out problems before theyconsideration paid, to the outside company in
become serious. For example, many founders willexchange for the IP rights it holds.
moonlight while holding on to full-time jobs through theThe same is true for every contractor or friend who
early startup phase. This often poses no specialhelped with development locally. Small option grants will
problems. Sometimes it does, however, and especiallyensure that IP rights are rounded up from all relevant
if the IP being developed overlaps with IP held by anparties. These grants should be vested in whole or in
employer of the moonlighting founder. Use a lawyer topart to ensure that proper consideration exists for the
identify and address such problems early on. It is muchIP assignment made by the consultants.
more costly to sort them out later.7. Protect the IP going forward.
2. Normally, go with a corporation instead of an LLC.When the startup is formed, all employees and
The LLC is a magnificent modern legal invention with acontractors who continue to work for it should sign
wild popularity that stems from its having become, forconfidentiality and invention assignment agreements or
sole-member entities (including husband-wife), thework-for-hire contracts as appropriate to ensure that
modern equivalent of the sole proprietorship with aall IP remains with the company.
limited liability cap on it.Such persons should also be paid valid consideration
When you move beyond sole member LLCs,for their efforts. If this is in the form of equity
however, you essentially have a partnership-stylecompensation, it should be accompanied by some
structure with a limited liability cap on it.form of cash compensation as well to avoid tax
The partnership-style structure does not lend itself wellproblems arising from the IRS placing a high value on
to common features of a startup. It is a clumsy vehiclethe stock by using the reasonable value of services as
for restricted stock and for preferred stock. It doesa measure of its value. If cash is a problem, salaries
not support the use of incentive stock options. Itmay be deferred as appropriate until first funding.
cannot be used as an investment vehicle for VCs.8. Consider provisional patent filings.
There are special cases where an LLC makes senseMany startups have IP whose value will largely be lost
for a startup but these are comparatively few inor compromised once it is disclosed to the others. In
number (e.g., where special tax allocations makesuch cases, see a good patent lawyer to determine a
sense, where a profits-only interest is important, wherepatent strategy for protecting such IP. If appropriate,
tax pass-through adds value). Work with a lawyer tofile provisional patents. Do this before making key
see if special case applies. If not, go with a corporation.disclosures to investors, etc.
3. Be cautious about Delaware.If early disclosures must be made, do this incrementally
Delaware offers few, if any advantages, for anand only under the terms of non-disclosure
early-stage startup. The many praises sung foragreements. In cases where investors refuse to sign
Delaware by business lawyers are justified for large,an nda (e.g., with VC firms), don't reveal your core
public companies. For startups, Delaware offers mostlyconfidential items until you have the provisional patents
administrative inconvenience.on file.
Some Delaware advantages from the standpoint of9. Set up equity incentives.
an insider group: (1) you can have a sole directorWith any true startup, equity incentives are the fuel
constitute the entire board of directors no matter howthat keeps a team going. At formation, adopt an equity
large and complex the corporate setup, giving aincentive plan. These plans will give the board of
dominant founder a vehicle for keeping everythingdirectors a range of incentives, unsually including
close the vest (if this is deemed desirable); (2) you canrestricted stock, incentive stock options (ISOs), and
dispense with cumulative voting, giving leverage tonon-qualified options (NQOs).
insiders who want to keep minority shareholders fromRestricted stock is usually used for founders and very
having board representation; (3) you can stagger thekey people. ISOs are used for employees only. NQOs
election of directors if desired.can be used with any employee, consultant, board
Delaware also is an efficient state for doing corporatemember, advisory director, or other key person. Each
filings, as anyone who has been frustrated by theof these tools has differing tax treatment. Use a good
delays and screw-ups of certain other state agenciesprofessional to advise you on this.
can attest.Of course, with all forms of stock and options, federal
On the down side -- and this is major -- Delawareand state securities laws must be satisfied. Use a
permits preferred shareholders who control thegood lawyer to do this.
majority of the company's voting stock to sell or10. Fund the company incrementally.
merge the company without requiring the consent ofResourceful startups will use funding strategies by
the common stock holders. This can easily lead towhich they don't necessarily go for large VC funding
downstream founder "wipe outs" via liquidationright out the gate. Of course, some of the very best
preferences held by such controlling shareholders.startups have needed major VC funding at inception
Also on the down side, early-stage startups incurand have achieved tremendous success. Most,
administrative hassles and extra costs with ahowever, will get into trouble if they need massive
Delaware setup. They still have to pay taxes oncapital infusions right up front and thereby find
income derived from their home states. They have tothemselves with few options if such funding is not
qualify their Delaware corporation as a "foreignavailable or if it is available only on oppressive terms.
corporation" in their home states and pay the extraThe best results for founders come when they have
franchise fees associated with that process. They getbuilt significant value in the startup before needing to
franchise tax bills in the tens of thousands of dollarsseek major funding. The dilutive hit is much less and
and have to apply for relief under Delaware'sthey often get much better general terms for their
alternative valuation method. None of these itemsfunding.
constitutes a crushing problem. Every one is anConclusion
adminstrative hassle.These tips suggest important legal elements that
My advice from years of experience working withfounders should factor into their broader strategic
founders: keep it simple and skip Delaware unlessplanning.
there is some compelling reason to choose it; if there isAs a founder, you should work closely with a good
a good reason, go with Delaware but don't foolstartup business lawyer to implement the steps
yourself into believing that you have gotten yourselfcorrectly. Self-help has its place in small companies, but
special prize for your early-stage startup.it almost invariably falls short when it comes to the
4. Use restricted stock for founders in most cases.complex setup issues associated with a startup. In this
If a founder gets stock without strings on it, and thenarea, get a good startup business lawyer and do it
walks away from the company, that founder will get aright.