Talent Management - What Every Manager Needs to Know About Talent Before They Manage It!

There's much talk of talent management incame easiest to you?
organisations these days, and HR and L & DWHAT WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT
departments wrestle with the most effective way ofTALENT
developing a talent management programme whichEvery one of us has natural talents: things we seem
truly delivers the required outcomes."hard-wired" to do; which come easy to us and which
One frequent question managers ask me is: "How do Iwe enjoy doing.
manage someone who is just not the right "fit" for theAnd the more we focus on and work on those areas,
role?"the closer we can get to excellence.
Getting square pegs into square holes is always aIt's easier to make a grade A an A star, than it is to
challenge - even for the greatest managers - but theremake a grade E into an A star. At best, you'll make an
are some things you absolutely must do andE into a C, and you'll probably meet with a lot of
understand, and some things you absolutely shouldresistance and unhappiness along the way!
avoid!Focusing on improving weaknesses results in mediocre
Some of the most exciting and robust research of theperformance.
last three decades I believe has come from Gallup,Focusing on improving natural talents and strengths
who have made it their focus to study excellence inresults in excellence.
organisations; where it exists; how it manifests andTALENT IN ORGANISATIONS - SOME FACTS
what we can learn from it. After years of researchGallup interview over 1.7 million employees and found:
and study into peak performance some interesting20% feel their strengths are in play every day 8 out of
ideas have emerged which perhaps challenge some10 feel "miscast" in their role They also found there
of our perceptions and beliefs about human talent andwas a direct correlation between staff being able to
ability.do what they do best every day and customer
Their work helps explain why, in order to develop anysatisfaction, profitability and staff turnover.
truly effective talent management programme, twoEFFECTIVE TALENT MANAGEMENT SUGGESTS
key things need to happen:WE ESTABLISH SOME NEW ASSUMPTIONS
Everyone needs to understand some basic principlesABOUT TALENT
about what talent is exactly, and why some of ourAssumption 1: Each person's talents are enduring and
most common assumptions about talent areunique Assumption 2: Each person's greatest room for
fundamentally flawed.growth is in the area of his or her greatest strength.
Managers need to learn how to effectively recogniseOutstanding managers know:
and manage talent to maximise overall organisationalEvery role, performed at excellence, requires talent.
performance.Excellence is impossible without talent. You cannot
So if you're a manager, and you want to develop andteach talent. Experience, brain power and will power
encourage excellence in performance, where do youare secondary for excellent performance. So these
start?managers select and place individuals based on talent
Step 1: Understand two of our most commonfirst.
assumptions about excellence are fundamentallyThey know the rest can be developed through
flawed.coaching, training and practise.
Assumption 1: Each person can learn to be competentStep 2: "Become as articulate about describing
in almost anything.excellence as you are about describing failure."
Assumption 2: Each person has greatest room forDisney We are all quite good at describing what
growth in his or her area of greatest weakness.someone is not doing well, or the behaviours we don't
It's often easier to identify and describe poorwant to see! We are perhaps less well practised in
performance than it is excellence. We can all describe,describing what we really need to see if we are to
often in great detail, what someone's weaknesses are,encourage excellence!
and from our early experiences as children in school,The critical key to effective talent management is
we learn to focus on those weaknesses with thematching the right talent with the right role. We need,
intent of trying to improve them. Reports tell us to "tryas managers, to understand specifically what makes
harder" or "concentrate more" at those subjects inour star performers in any role as good as they are.
which we display weakness.What exactly is it that they are doing, or thinking or
When we move into the world of work, that samefeeling which is different to your average performers
approach to personal development and our careerin that role?
path continues: we learn to identify the weaknessesWhat is interesting is that, if you study your stars, you
and then somehow help people overcome thosewill find there are similarities in their answers, and these
weaknesses by some form of development in thatgive you clues about what you need to see in anyone
area.else you recruit into this position, or place in a particular
All the focus and intention is on making us "moreproject.
well-rounded" individuals - to bring our weaknesses upGallup suggests managers:
to the level of our strengths.Study your stars in a particular role. What do they feel
But excellence in any field of human endeavour youare the most challenging aspects of their role? What
choose simply doesn't work like that!do they seem to do, think or feel about the different
If you told Roger Federer he was good enough ataspects of their job, particularly the most challenging
tennis when he was young, and asked him to improveaspects?
his golf, would he become a Tiger Woods?Draw up a role profile based on the answers your
If you asked a young lawyer who seems naturallystars give you.
gifted at criminal law to improve at corporate law,Create questions you can ask in a "talent interview".
would this make him a better lawyer?As long as organisations and managers believe we
If you had to have heart surgery, would you rather itcan learn to be competent in almost anything, and that
was from someone who had spent years perfectingwe can grow most in our areas of weakness, we will
and specialising in this field, or have a Generalcontinue to promote people to management who
Practioner look after you?shouldn't be there; to re-shuffle people in a restructure
And when you were at school, did you focus hardest,without really paying attention to whether this role will
work hardest and concentrate most on the subjectsplay to their natural talents or not, and to suffer the
you weren't good at, or the ones you loved, and whichconsequences of square pegs in round holes.